<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dutch/American English/German: Freight and Edward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fontshop.com/2012/11/28/dutchamerican-englishgerman-freight-and-edward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fontshop.com/2012/11/28/dutchamerican-englishgerman-freight-and-edward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.fontshop.com/2012/11/28/dutchamerican-englishgerman-freight-and-edward/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fontshop.com/?p=8731#comment-2372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s important here to bear in mind that Edward is not a faithful revival of Johnston&#039;s sans. The reason it reminds us of Gill Sans is more because there is a lot of Gill in its design (see for example &#039;t&#039; and &#039;y&#039;) than because of similarities in the original typefaces, which are actually quite distinct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important here to bear in mind that Edward is not a faithful revival of Johnston&#8217;s sans. The reason it reminds us of Gill Sans is more because there is a lot of Gill in its design (see for example &#8216;t&#8217; and &#8216;y&#8217;) than because of similarities in the original typefaces, which are actually quite distinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
